袁毅,肖颖喆,陈琳璋,谭海湖,谢勇.折叠纸盒锁底结构承载力实验研究[J].包装工程,2014,35(7):29-33,85.
YUAN Yi,XIAO Ying-zhe,CHEN Lin-zhang,TAN Hai-hu,XIE Yong.Carrying Capacity of the Bottom Lock Structure of Folding Carton[J].Packaging Engineering,2014,35(7):29-33,85. |
| 折叠纸盒锁底结构承载力实验研究 |
| Carrying Capacity of the Bottom Lock Structure of Folding Carton |
| 投稿时间：2013-10-08 修订日期：2014-04-01 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 折叠纸盒 锁底结构 承载力 |
| 英文关键词: folding carton bottom lock structure capacity |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(61170101) ;中央财政包装行业高新技术研发基金资助项目( 湘财企指[2008]155 号) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 研究锁底结构形式对纸盒承载力的影响。 方法 选取 3 种常用的锁底结构( 插口式、1-2-3 锁底式、典型自锁底式) 进行压缩试验和跌落试验。 结果 进行压缩试验时,插口式盒底被破坏时仪器显示的峰值为 31 . 2 N;压缩试验无法破坏后 2 种锁底结构,因此采用跌落实验,获知 1-2-3 锁底式被破坏时砝码质量为 180 g,典型自锁底式被破坏时砝码质量为 205 g。 结论 综合比较得知,相较于插口式,典型自锁底结构和 1-2-3 锁底结构的纸盒承载力优势明显,典型自锁底结构表现最强。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the effects of the bottom lock structure on the carrying capacity of the folding carton. Methods Three commonly used bottom lock structures ( sockets style, 1-2-3 bottom lock structure, bottom self-locking structure) were selected for compression test and drop test. Results The socket-type bottom of the box was damaged when the instrument displayed a peak of 31. 2 N during the compression test; the tensile testing machine could not destroy the latter two lock bottom structures. In the drop test, the weight of code was 180 g when the 1-2-3 bottom lock structure was damaged, and the number was 205 g when the bottom self-locking structure was damaged. Conclusion The comprehensive comparison showed that, compared to socket style, the bottom self-locking structure and the 1-2-3 bottom lock structure had obvious advantages in carrying capacity, and the bottom self-locking structure had the best performance. And an appropriate locking style could improve the capacity of sockets style. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
渝公网安备 50010702501716号