| 卢川.艺术设计史观的解构与重述[J].包装工程,2018,39(8):19-22. |
| 艺术设计史观的解构与重述 |
| Deconstruction and Reiteration of Historical Viewpoint of Art and Design |
| 投稿时间：2018-03-15 修订日期：2018-04-20 |
| DOI：10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2018.08.005 |
| 中文关键词: 设计史 艺术史观 建构文化研究 |
| 英文关键词: design history historical viewpoint of art studies on tectonic culture |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 建构符合艺术设计学学科逻辑的历史写作观念与方法。方法 一方面对国内艺术设计史写作的体例进行具体分析，提出其写作中以风格化和形式分析为导向的诸多缺陷；另一方面则引述艺术史与建筑史研究的相关成果，试图对艺术设计史研究进行修正，主要以“线性的艺术史的终结”与“建构文化研究”两则话题为参照。结论 同建筑史与艺术史观念变化的动因相同，当下的艺术设计史写作应产生出与线性的、发展的和进步式的“大设计史”所能相互补充的，类别的、微观的、技术的设计史。同时，设计史注定不等于艺术史和美学史，其研究不能单纯视作社会史表述的补充，而应体现其制造本质，从而形成理论与实践的交互。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| It aims to construct the concepts and approaches of historical writing in accordance with the disciplines of art design. Cases of historical writing in art design in China are studied, and flaws of stylization and formalism are identified. Corrections to the study of art design history are attempted by quoting the latest results of art and architecture history research, mainly referencing "the end of linear art history" and "studies on tectonic culture". Today's historical writing of art and design should reflect typological, microcosmic and technological design history that complements "the great design history", which is linear, developing, and progressive. After all, design history is neither art history nor aesthetic history. The study of art design history should not be regarded as the supplement of social history, but it should exhibit the essence of creation and realize the interactions between theory and practice. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
