何修传,薛俊杰,熊辉,彭凯.设计思维国际研究20年文献计量分析和内容分析[J].包装工程,2024,45(12):105-120. |
设计思维国际研究20年文献计量分析和内容分析 |
Bibliometrics and Content Analysis of 20 Years of International Research on Design Thinking |
投稿时间:2024-01-24 |
DOI:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2024.12.011 |
中文关键词: 设计思维 内容分析 计量分析 Vosviewer Citespace |
英文关键词: design thinking content analysis bibliometrics Vosviewer Citespace |
基金项目:2022上海市教育科学研究项目(C2022029);2023年度广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目(粤教高函〔2024〕9号) |
|
摘要点击次数: |
全文下载次数: |
中文摘要: |
目的 通过对国际著名数据库WOS(Web of Science)中20年间1 482篇设计思维文献进行系统化分析性研究,以期获得对该领域更客观可信的认知与理解。方法 文献计量分析结合内容分析,对设计思维研究整体概况、理论基础、研究热点、动态趋势进行分析、解读和论述。结论 设计思维研究呈现快速发展,主要集中在商业管理、设计和教育这几个学科中,美国斯坦福大学为学术研究核心;设计思维的理论基础主要源起于管理创新、棘手问题、反思性实践、设计师式思考、设计科学、创造性活动六个研究视角;热点议题主要集中在设计思维本体认知阐述、设计思维创新策略、设计思维教育应用、设计思维赋能产品开发、设计思维多领域实践五个主题;其研究呈现出从系统性思维论述走向科学化认知分析、从专业化设计实践走向多元化知识资源整合、从复杂问题求解走向开放式创新方法论的发展动势;设计思维研究具有显著的跨学科和实践性特征,创新是设计思维研究的本质属性。 |
英文摘要: |
Through the systematic analysis on 1 482 design thinking literature from the renowned international database Web of Science (WOS) over a span of 20 years, the work aims to obtain a more objective and credible understanding of the field. Based on the combination of bibliometrics with content analysis, the overall profile, theoretical foundations, research hotspots, and dynamic trends of design thinking research were analyzed, interpreted and discussed. Design thinking research has shown rapid development, mainly concentrated in the disciplines of business management, design, and education, with Stanford University in the United States as the academic research core. The theoretical foundations of design thinking mainly originate from six research perspectives of management innovation, wicked problems, reflective practice, designerly thinking, design science, and creative activities. The hot topics mainly focus on five themes of ontological cognition of design thinking, innovative strategies of design thinking, applications of design thinking in education, empowering product development with design thinking, and multi-domain practices of design thinking. The research demonstrates a development trend from systemic thinking discourse to scientific cognitive analysis, from specialized design practices to the integration of diverse knowledge resources, and from solution of complex problems to open innovation methodologies. Design thinking research exhibits significant interdisciplinary and practical characteristics, with innovation as its essential attribute. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|