集成AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS模型的输液坐具设计研究

刘晶; 宋秀秀; 曾梓珊; 余佳; 孙雯

doi:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.12.013

PDF(917 KB)

包装工程（设计栏目） ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12) : 144-153. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.12.013

工业设计

集成AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS模型的输液坐具设计研究

刘晶¹, 宋秀秀², 曾梓珊¹, 余佳¹, 孙雯^1*

作者信息 +

Infusion Seat Design Integrating AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS Model

LIU Jing¹, SONG Xiuxiu², ZENG Zishan¹, YU Jia¹, SUN Wen^1*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的为解决输液坐具设计方案的优选问题,提出一种集成AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS模型的理论方法,并将其应用于输液坐具设计方案决策中。方法首先经由用户访谈、专家咨询等方式构建评价指标层次模型;然后借助层次分析法（Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP）、CRITIC权重法（Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation,CRITIC）求解评价指标的主客观权重,进而确定组合权重,同时考虑用户满意度偏好引入模糊卡诺模型（Fuzzy Kano Model,FKM）获取评价指标属性类别,据此对组合权重加以修正;最后运用逼近理想解排序法（Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution,TOPSIS）得出设计方案的贴近度,以完成设计方案的优劣排序与优选。结论 AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS集成模型帮助设计人员解决多方案决策过程中的优选问题,同时融合用户满意度偏好以使方案优选结果更加符合用户期望。

Abstract

The work aims to propose a theoretical method integrating the AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS model and apply it in the decision-making of infusion seat design solutions, so as to solve the optimization problem of infusion seat design solutions. Firstly, a hierarchical model of evaluation indicators was constructed through user interviews, expert consultations, and other methods. Then, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) Weight Method were applied to solve the subjective and objective weights of evaluation indicators to determine the combination weights, while considering user satisfaction preferences and introducing a Fuzzy Kano Model (FKM) to obtain the attribute categories of evaluation indicators, and modify the combination weights based on them. Finally, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) sorting method was used to determine the closeness of the design solution, to complete the ranking and optimization of the design solution. The AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS integrated model helps designers solve the problem of optimal selection in the decision-making process of multiple solutions, while integrating user satisfaction preferences to make the optimal solution results more in line with user expectations.

导出引用

刘晶, 宋秀秀, 曾梓珊, 余佳, 孙雯. 集成AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS模型的输液坐具设计研究[J]. 包装工程（设计栏目）. 2025, 46(12): 144-153 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.12.013

LIU Jing, SONG Xiuxiu, ZENG Zishan, YU Jia, SUN Wen. Infusion Seat Design Integrating AHP-CRITIC-FKM-TOPSIS Model[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2025, 46(12): 144-153 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.12.013

中图分类号： TB472

参考文献

[1] 卫生健康委. 关于开展改善就医感受提升患者体验主题活动的通知[EB/OL]. (2007-12-20) [2010-02-17]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202305/content_6883385.htm.
Notice on Carrying out Theme Activities to Improve Medical Experience and Enhance Patient Experience by the Health Commission [EB/OL] (2007-12-20) [2010-02-17] https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202305/content_6883385.htm.
[2] 周志勇, 袁延通, 戚建明. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的失眠治疗仪设计研究[J]. 制造业自动化, 2023, 45(7): 11-14.
ZHOU Z Y, YUAN Y T, QI J M.Research on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Modeling Design of Insomnia Therapeutic Instrument[J]. Manufacturing Automation, 2023, 45(7): 11-14.
[3] 申黎明, 齐碧童, 张丰, 等. 基于模糊综合评价的办公椅扶手设计改进研究[J]. 家具与室内装饰, 2023, 30(8): 18-23.
SHEN L M, QI B T, ZHANG F,et al.Research on the Improvement of Armrests in Office Chairs Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Furniture & Interior Design, 2023, 30(8): 18-23.
[4] 陈思旭, 商蕾, 汪敏, 等. 基于模糊层次分析的邮轮客舱设计综合评价研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2021, 43(21): 68-73.
CHEN S X, SHANG L, WANG M, et al.Comprehensive Evaluation Research of Cruise Cabin Design Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2021, 43(21): 68-73.
[5] 杨昕妍, 张继娟, 谭雨婕, 等. 基于FAHP-熵权理论的康复轮椅方案决策灰色评估[J]. 林产工业, 2023, 60(7): 69-74.
YANG X Y, ZHANG J J, TAN Y J, et al.Gray Evaluation of Rehabilitation Wheelchair Program Decision Based on FAHP-Entropy Power Theory[J]. China Forest Products Industry, 2023, 60(7): 69-74.
[6] 柴敏, 马彧. 基于AHP和加权灰色关联分析的并条机设计评价研究[J]. 包装工程, 2022, 43(4): 251-257.
CHAI M, MA Y.Design and Evaluation of Drawing Frame Based on AHP and Weighted Grey Relational Analysis[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2022, 43(4): 251-257.
[7] 石元伍, 张兆辉, 朱震东, 等. 基于灰色综合评价的数控机床人机界面感性意象[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2022, 38(3): 158-162.
SHI Y W, ZHANG Z H, ZHU Z D, et al.Research on Kansei Image of Human-Machine Interface of CNC Based on Grey Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Machine Design & Research, 2022, 38(3): 158-162.
[8] 谭雨婕, 杨昕妍, 张仲凤, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS法的儿童卧房家具设计研究[J]. 林产工业, 2023, 60(4): 69-74.
TAN Y J, YANG X Y, ZHANG Z F,et al.Research on the Design of Children’s Bedroom Furniture Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method[J]. China Forest Products Industry, 2023, 60(4): 69-74.
[9] 卢颖, 高若琳, 赵军朝, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的控制电气机箱电磁防护方案评估方法[J]. 火炮发射与控制学报, 2024, 45(2): 112-118.
LU Y, GAO R L, ZHAO J C,et al.Assessment Method for Electromagnetic Protection Solutions for Electrical Control Cabinets Using AHP-TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Gun Launch & Control, 2024, 45(2): 112-118.
[10] 周红宇, 张敏祥, 朱倩, 等. 面向可适应性的果园运输小车设计与评价[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(11): 79-86.
ZHOU H Y, ZHANG M X, ZHU Q, et al.Design and Evaluation of Orchard Transport Trolley for Adaptability[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2023, 44(11): 79-86.
[11] 李壮壮, 曹萍萍. 最优值距离综合评价法的改进及其应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(21): 35-41.
LI Z Z, CAO P P.Improvement and Application of Optimal Distance Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2021, 37(21): 35-41.
[12] 吕帅, 李永锋. 基于熵权和灰关联的老年人信息终端界面布局评价研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(2): 128-136.
LYU S, LI Y F.Layout Evaluation of Information Terminal Interface for the Elderly Based on Entropy Weight Method and Grey Relational Analysis[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(2): 128-136.
[13] 王文顺, 崔俊杰, 刘勇, 等. 基于BN-AHP的装甲车辆动力系统故障状态评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2024, 45(3): 86-93.
WANG W S, CUI J J, LIU Y, et al.Fault State Evaluation of Armored Vehicle Power System Based on BN-AHP[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2024, 45(3): 86-93.
[14] 郑镇华, 严波, 史佳龙. 以用户需求为导向的智能床设计[J]. 林业工程学报, 2024, 9(3): 184-193.
ZHENG Z H, YAN B, SHI J L.Research on Design Methods of Smart Bed Products Based on User Demands[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2024, 9(3): 184-193.
[15] 吴达雷, 梁树华, 陈长基, 等. 基于多维赋权威布尔分布的智能电表可靠性评价方法[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(4): 164-173.
WU D L, LIANG S H, CHEN C J, et al.Smart Meter Reliability Evaluation Method Based on Multidimensional Assigned Authority Boolean Distribution[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 46(4): 164-173.
[16] 范超杰, 韩得民, 刘嘉滢, 等. 基于驾驶绩效的铁路人因安全评价指标体系研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2024,21(11): 4442-4455.
FAN C J, HAN D M, LIU J Y, et al.Research on Railway Human Factors Safety Evaluation Index System Based on Driving Performance[J] Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2024, 21(11): 4442-4455.
[17] DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L.Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems: The Critic Method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22(7): 763-770.
[18] 陈俊文, 王丽, 路嘉, 等. 基于CRITIC法的平陆运河内河段生境健康评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024, (9): 21-28.
CHEN J W, WANG L, LU J, et al Habitat Health Assessment of Pinglu Canal Inland Section Based on Critical Method[J]. China Rural Water Resources and Hydropower, 2024, (9): 21-28.
[19] 张文超, 吴迪, 王明伟, 等. 基于Critic权重法多目标优化汽车B柱上饰板注塑成型工艺[J]. 工程塑料应用, 2024, 52(4): 83-88.
ZHANG W C, WU D, WANG M W, et al.Multi-Objective Optimization of Automotive B-Pillar Upper Trim Plate Injection Molding Process Based on Critic Weight Method[J]. Engineering Plastics Application, 2024, 52(4): 83-88.
[20] 胡宁峰, 王卫星, 张宁, 等. 基于改进CRITIC- TOPSIS和计算美学的数控机床形态评价方法[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2023, 39(1): 170-175.
HU N F, WANG W X, ZHANG N, et al.Cnc Machine Tool Form Evaluation Method Based on Improved Critic-Topsis and Computational Aesthetics[J]. Machine Design & Research, 2023, 39(1): 170-175.
[21] 刘丽佳, 田洋, 刘思羽, 等. 森林康养基地服务的消费者需求类型研究——基于卡诺模型及顾客满意度与不满意度系数分析[J]. 林业经济, 2021, 43(4): 83-96.
LIU L J, TIAN Y, LIU S Y, et al.Study on Consumer Demand Types of Forest Health Base Service—Analysis Based on KANO Model and Better-Worse Index[J]. Forestry Economics, 2021, 43(4): 83-96.
[22] 周祺,李旭,周济颜.模糊Kano与情景FBS模型集成创新设计方法[J]. 图学学报,2020,41(5): 796-804.
ZHOU Q, LI X, ZHOU J Y.Integrated Innovative Design Method of Fuzzy Kano and Scenario FBS Model[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2020, 41(5): 796-804.
[23] 郭秀珍, 龚青山, 刘敏, 等. 基于相对熵-TOPSIS的机床可再制造性方案评价系统开发[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2024, (6): 147-152.
GUO X Z, GONG Q S, LIU M, et al Development of Evaluation System for Machine Tool Remanufacturability Scheme Based on Relative Entropy TOPSIS[J]. Manufacturing Technology and Machine Tools, 2024, (6): 147-152.
[24] 李享, 吕志鹏, 夏博昌, 等. 铁钻工遥控盒改进设计与评价优选[J]. 机械设计, 2025, 42(3): 187-194.
LI X, LYU Z P, XIX B C, et al.Improved Design and Evaluation Optimization of Iron Roughn[J]. Mechanical Design, 2025, 42(3): 187-194.
[25] 徐劲力, 李丁, 卢杰, 等. 利用熵权TOPSIS和遗传算法的焊接单元划分方法[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2024, (7): 151-157.
XU J L, LI D, LU J, et al Welding Cell Division Method Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS and Genetic Algorithm[J]. Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, 2024, (7): 151-157.
[26] 刘玲玲, 马彪, 潘梦媛, 等. 用户需求视角下湘西竹编纹样在家具设计中的应用[J]. 林业工程学报, 2024, 9(2): 167-174.
LIU L L, MA B, PAN M Y,et al.Application of Xiangxi Bamboo Pattern in Furniture Design from the Perspective of User Demands[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2024, 9(2): 167-174.
[27] 田林钢, 马成功, 王绪. 基于AHP-熵权法的水利工程业主风险模糊评价[J]. 人民黄河, 2017, 39(12): 117-122.
TIAN L G, MA C G, WANG X.Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Owner's Risk of Water Conservancy Project Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method[J]. Yellow River, 2017, 39(12): 117-122.