目的 为提高自动泊车系统实际使用率,构建自动泊车系统用户使用意愿模型,探究影响用户对自动泊车系统使用意愿的关键因素。方法 基于文献调研与技术接受模型,引入涵盖信任度和感知安全性的4个外部变量,建立了自动泊车系统使用意愿的理论模型。随后设计了相应的量表和问卷,并对数据进行因子分析和信效度检验。之后通过结构方程模型和中介效应检验深入探讨了自动泊车系统使用意愿的内在因果关系。结果 内部环境因素、认知安全性、情绪安全性和感知有用性对自动泊车系统具有显著的正向影响。其中,感知有用性直接影响使用意愿。内部环境因素、认知安全性和情绪安全性通过感知有用性间接影响使用意愿。结论 根据各因素的影响机制,自动驾驶汽车泊车系统在今后的改进中应着重增强用户的使用体验、提升系统的操作性和易用性,增强用户对该系统的感知有用性,进而提升用户对自动泊车系统的使用意愿。
Abstract
To improve the actual usage rate of the automatic parking system, the work aims to construct a model of the willingness to use the automatic parking system, so as to explore the key factors influencing the willingness to use the system. Based on the literature review and the technology acceptance model, four external variables covering trust and perceived safety were introduced to establish a theoretical model of the willingness to use the automatic parking system. Subsequently, corresponding scales and questionnaires were designed, and data were subject to factor analysis and reliability and validity tests. Through structural equation modeling and intermediate effect tests, the intrinsic causal relationships of the willingness to use the automatic parking system were thoroughly investigated. The internal environmental factors, cognitive security, emotional security, and perceived usefulness had a significant positive impact on the automatic parking system. Specifically, perceived usefulness directly influenced the willingness to use the system. The internal environmental factors, cognitive security, and emotional security indirectly influenced the willingness through perceived usefulness. Based on the influencing mechanisms of various factors, it is recommended that future improvements to the automatic parking system should focus on enhancing user experience, improving system operability and usability, strengthening users' perception of usefulness of the system, thereby increasing the willingness to use the automatic parking system.
关键词
自动泊车系统 /
结构方程模型 /
驾驶员 /
使用意愿
Key words
automatic parking systems /
structural equation modeling /
drivers /
willingness to use
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] MANGIARACINA R, TUMINO A, MIRAGLIOTTA G, et al.Smart Parking Management in a Smart City: Costs and Benefits[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI). Berlin: IEEE, 2017: 27-32.
[2] DE VISSER E J, PHILLIPS E, TENHUNDFELD N, et al. Trust in Automated Parking Systems: A Mixed Methods Evaluation[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2023(96): 185-199.
[3] 孙龄波, 唐秋生, 游宇. 基于改进TAM 的无人驾驶出租车接受度研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022(6): 1540-1549.
SUN L B, TANG Q S, YOU Y.Study on Acceptance of Autonomous Taxi Based on Improved TAM[J]. Journal of Railway Science & Engineering, 2022(6):1540-1549.
[4] 霍月英, 郭晨, 朱援, 等. 共享自动驾驶汽车使用意愿模型及其影响因素[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(7): 1057-1064.
HUO Y Y, GUO C, ZHU Y, et al.Model of Intention to Use Shared Autonomous Driving Cars and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2021, 42(7):1057-1064.
[5] JIN S Y, ZHAO C L, WU H J, et al.Study on the Willingness to Use and Parking Behavior of Automated Valet Parking[C]//CICTP 2023. Beijing: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2023: 706-715.
[6] NORDHOFF S, STAPEL J, HE X, et al.Do Driver's Characteristics, System Performance, Perceived Safety, and Trust Influence How Drivers Use Partial Automation? A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023(14): 1125031.
[7] NORDHOFF S, STAPEL J, HE X, et al.Perceived Safety and Trust in SAE Level 2 Partially Automated Cars: Results from an Online Questionnaire[J]. Plos one, 2021, 16(12): e0260953.
[8] YANG G, CAIATI V, RASOULI S, et al.Understanding Drivers' Behavioral Intention to Use Guidance System in Urban Complex Parking Lot Based on the C-TAM-TPB Framework[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2024, 2678(11): 651-669.
[9] 李娜, 高颂华. 文化遗产类AR中用户使用意愿影响因素研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(4): 87-98.
LI N, GAO S H.Factors Influencing Users' Intention to Use Cultural Heritage AR[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(4): 87-98.
[10] 项开鹏, 邹欣, 殷超. 数字化科普展品用户的行为意向研究[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41(10): 163-167.
XIANG K P, ZOU X, YIN C.User Behavioral Intention in Digital Popular Science Products[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2020, 41(10): 163-167.
[11] YANG C, YE X, XIE J, et al.Analyzing Drivers' Intention to Accept Parking APP by Structural Equation Model[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020(1): 20-30.
[12] ZHOU S, SUN X, LIU B, et al.Factors Affecting Pedestrians' Trust in Automated Vehicles: Literature Review and Theoretical Model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2021, 52(3): 490-500.
[13] HOFF K A, BASHIR M.Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors that Influence Trust[J]. Human Factors, 2015, 57(3): 407-434.
[14] PRASETIO E A, NURLIYANA C.Evaluating Perceived Safety of Autonomous Vehicle: The Influence of Privacy and Cybersecurity to Cognitive and Emotional Safety[J]. IATSS Research, 2023, 47(2): 160-170.
[15] KRAUS J, SCHOLZ D, STIEGEMEIER D, et al.The More You Know: Trust Dynamics and Calibration in Highly Automated Driving and the Effects of Take- overs, System Malfunction, and System Transparency[J]. Human Factors, 2020, 62(5): 718-736.
[16] MONTORO L, USECHE S A, ALONSO F, et al.Perceived Safety and Attributed Value as Predictors of the Intention to Use Autonomous Vehicles: A National Study with Spanish Drivers[J]. Safety Science, 2019(120): 865-876.
[17] XU Z, ZHANG K, MIN H, et al.What Drives People to Accept Automated Vehicles? Findings from a Field Experiment[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018(95): 320-334.
[18] CHO Y, PARK J, PARK S, et al.Technology Acceptance Modeling Based on User Experience for Autonomous Vehicles[J]. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2017, 36(2): 87-108.
[19] CAO J, LIN L, ZHANG J, et al.The Development and Validation of the Perceived Safety of Intelligent Connected Vehicles Scale[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021(154): 106092.
[20] LIU P, XU Z, ZHAO X.Road Tests of Self-driving Vehicles: Affective and Cognitive Pathways in Acceptance Formation[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019(124): 354-369.
[21] 刘佳静, 匡莉, 潘婕, 等. 省级公共文化云微信用户持续使用意愿研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2022, 41(07): 47-57.
LIU J J, KUANG L, PAN J.Research on Users' Continuance Intention for Provincial Public Cultural Cloud WeChat[J]. Library Magazine, 2022, 41(7): 47-57.
[22] EDELMANN A, STUMPE S, PETZOLDT T.The Interaction between Perceived Safety and Perceived Usefulness in Automated Parking as a Result of Safety Distance[J]. Applied ergonomics, 2023(108): 103962.
[23] LEE J, LEE D, PARK Y, et al.Autonomous Vehicles can be Shared, but a Feeling of Ownership is Important: Examination of the Influential Factors for Intention to Use Autonomous Vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019(107): 411-422.
[24] 李卓, 童先顺, 田慧溢, 等. 增强现实抬头显示器视觉解释类型对自动驾驶系统用户接受度的影响[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(2): 40-48.
LI Z,TONG X S, TIAN H Y, et al.The Effect of Visual Explanation Types of Augmented Reality Head-up Display on User Acceptance of Autonomous Driving System[J]. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2023, 40(2): 40-48.
[25] 胡珊, 张东, 兰亚珍. 基于UTAUT/HBM的老年MCI认知训练APP持续使用意愿研究[J]. 包装工程, 2024(16): 101-110.
HU S, ZHANG D, LAN Y Z.Continuance Intention for Cognitive Training APP in Older Adults with MCI Based on UTAUT and HBM[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2024(16): 101-110, 137.
[26] BAGOZZI R P, YI Y. Specification, Evaluation,Interpretation of Structural Equation Models[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2012(40): 8-34.
PDF(528 KB)
渝公网安备 50010702501717号