时延环境下遥操作系统移动控制任务认知负荷分析

孙家豪; 阎家岱; 朱诗源

doi:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.02.004

PDF(971 KB)

包装工程（设计栏目） ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 37-46. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.02.004

工业设计

时延环境下遥操作系统移动控制任务认知负荷分析

孙家豪, 阎家岱, 朱诗源^*

作者信息 +

Analysis of Cognitive Load in Mobile Control Teleoperation Systems under Time-delayed Environments

SUN Jiahao, YAN Jiadai, ZHU Shiyuan^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨了时延程度和视觉偏好如何演变并影响移动控制远程操纵系统中的人机交互。方法构建了移动控制遥操作虚拟仿真实验系统,对24名参与者进行了移动控制实验测试和分析。使用技术接受模型（TAM）和NASA任务负荷指数（NASA-TLX）问卷进行了主观测量,以了解参与者所经历的认知负荷变化。研究还探讨了预测显示技术在减轻操作员认知负荷方面的适用性。结果虚拟现实预测显示界面（VR-PGI）在增强用户态势感知和减轻认知负担方面优于图像预测显示界面（I-PGI）。此外,用户的偏好不仅受到客观效率的影响,而且受到VR-PGI提供的、身临其境的体验和互动的影响。此外,预测性显示技术被证明能有效减轻时间延迟对认知负荷的负面影响。结论本研究为遥操作中预测显示界面（PGI）的设计提供了理论指导和实践建议,强调了在设计时兼顾客观效率和用户体验的重要性,以平衡预测准确性和用户体验之间的关系,促进预测显示技术的广泛应用。

Abstract

The work aims to investigate how delay extent and visual preference evolve and impact human-computer interaction in mobile control teleoperation systems. A virtual simulation experiment system for mobile control teleoperation was constructed to test and analyze the mobile control experiment on 24 participants. Subjective measurements were conducted with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaires to understand the changes in cognitive load experienced by participants. Then, the applicability of predictive display technology in reducing the cognitive load of operators was explored. The Virtual Reality Predictive Display Interface (VR-PGI) was superior to the Image Predictive Display Interface (I-PGI) in enhancing user situational awareness and reducing cognitive burden. Moreover, user preferences were influenced not only by objective efficiency but also by the immersive experience and interaction provided by VR-PGI. Additionally, predictive display techniques were shown to be effective in mitigating the negative effects of time delays on cognitive load. This research provides theoretical guidance and practical suggestions for the design of predictive display interfaces (PGIs) in teleoperation, emphasizing the importance of considering both objective efficiency and user experience in design to balance the relationship between predictive accuracy and user experience and promoting the widespread application of predictive display technology in the field of teleoperation.

导出引用1

孙家豪, 阎家岱, 朱诗源. 时延环境下遥操作系统移动控制任务认知负荷分析[J]. 包装工程. 2026, 47(2): 37-46 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.02.004

SUN Jiahao, YAN Jiadai, ZHU Shiyuan. Analysis of Cognitive Load in Mobile Control Teleoperation Systems under Time-delayed Environments[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2026, 47(2): 37-46 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.02.004

中图分类号： TB482 TH122

参考文献

[1] JUNJIE C, WEIYI H, AIGUO S.Dynamic Model of Human Operator in Force Telepresence System Based on Virtual Reality Technology[J]. Journal of Transcluction Technology, 2002, 15(1): 38-42.
[2] ARCARA P, MELCHIORRI C.Control Schemes for Teleoperation with Time Delay: A Comparative Study[J]. Robotics & Autonomous Systems, 2002, 38(1): 49-64.
[3] GAUVAIN M.Cognitive load theory[J]. Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 2010, 55(4): 37-76.
[4] BEJCZY A, KIM W, VENEMA S.The Phantom Robot: Predictive Displays for Teleoperation with Time Delay[C]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, New York: IEEE, 1990.
[5] 丑武胜, 孟偲, 陈建新, 等. 空间科学实验机器人辅助遥操作系统[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2003(6): 10-16.
CHOU W S, MENG C, CHEN J X, et al.Robot-assisted Remote Operating System for Space Science Experiments[J]. China Space Science and Technology, 2003(6): 10-16.
[6] SHERIDAN T B.Human Supervisory Control of Robot Systems[C]// Proceedings of the 1986 IEEE International Conference, New York: IEEE, 1986.
[7] HIRZINGER G, LANDZETTEL K, DIETRICH J .Sensorbased Space Robotics — ROTEX and Its Telerobotic Features[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Graz: Elsevier, 1993.
[8] FREUND E, ROSSMANN J, BRASCH M.Open Multi- agent Control Architecture to Support Virtual-reality- based Man-machine Interfaces[J]. The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2001(4571): 219-229.
[9] DYBVIK H, LOLAND M, GERSTENBERG A, et al.A Low-cost Predictive Display for Teleoperation: Investigating Effects on Human Performance and Workload[J]. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 2021, 145(1): 10-15.
[10] 龚德英, 张大均. 多媒体学习中认知负荷的优化控制[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013.
GONG D Y, ZHANG D J.Optimal Control of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2013.
[11] KALYUGA S, RENKL A.Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Instructional Implications: Introduction to the Special Issue[J]. Instructional Science, 2010, 38(3): 209-215.
[12] SWELLER J.Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning[J]. Cognitive Science, 1988, 12(2): 257-285.
[13] GOMBOLAY M, BAIR A, HUANG C, et al.Computational Design of Mixed-initiative Human-Robot Teaming that Considers Human Factors: Situational Awareness, Workload, and Workflow Preferences[J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2017(36): 597-617.
[14] PARASURAMAN R, SHERIDAN T B, WICKENS C D . Situation Awareness, Mental Workload,Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs[J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2008, 2(2): 140-160.
[15] CACACE F, GERMANI A, MANES C.An Observer for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Time Varying Observation Delay[J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2010, 59(5): 305-312.
[16] FARZA M, M'SAAD M, MENARD T, et al. Simple Cascade Observer for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Long Output Delays[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2015, 60(12): 3338-3343.
[17] LI Y, LIU S, XI N,et al.A Study of the Relationship between Brain States and Skill Level of Teleoperator[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics(ROBIO). Shenhen: IEEE, 2013.
[18] SCHMIDLIN E A, JONES K S .Do Tele-operators Learn to Better Judge Whether a Robot can Passthrough an Aperture?[J]. Human Factors, 2016, 58(2): 360-369.
[19] LOFT S, SANDERSON P, NEAL A, et al.Modeling and Predicting Mental Workload in En route Air Traffic Control: Critical Review and Broader Implications[J]. Human Factors, 2007, 49(3): 376-399.
[20] BROOKINGS J B, WILSON G F, SWAIN C R.Psychophysiological Responses to Changes in Workload during Simulated Air Traffic Control[J]. Biological Psychology, 1996, 42(3): 361-377.
[21] HART S G, STAVELAND L E.Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research[J]. Advances in Psychology, 1988(52): 139-183.
[22] ABBOOD H, ALNUAIMY W, ALATABY A,et al.Prediction of Driver Fatigue: Approaches and Open Challenges[C]// Proceedings of the 2014 14th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI), Bradford: IEEE, 2014.
[23] STEINFELD A, FONG T, KABER D, et al.Common Metrics for Human-robot Interaction[C]. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human- robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2006.
[24] CLARKE M A, SCHUETZLER R M, WINDLE J R, et al.Usability and Cognitive Load in the Design of a Personal Health Record[J]. Health Policy and Technology, 2020, 9(2): 218-224.
[25] 尤乾. 面向虚拟现实的数字界面可用性研究与应用[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2020.
YOU QIAN.Research and Application of Virtual Reality Oriented Digital Interface Usability[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2020.
[26] FERRELL W R.Remote Manipulation with Transmission Delay[J]. IEEE Transactions onHuman Factors in Electronics, 1965(1): 24-32.