Evaluation of Medical Equipment Ecosystem Interfaces Based on a Comprehensive Weighting-PROMETHEE &#x02161; Model

TIAN Fei; HAO Jiahui; JI Hairu; ZHOU Huan

doi:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.06.009

PDF(4767 KB)

Packaging Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6) : 87-101. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.06.009

Industrial Design

Evaluation of Medical Equipment Ecosystem Interfaces Based on a Comprehensive Weighting-PROMETHEE Ⅱ Model

TIAN Fei, HAO Jiahui, JI Hairu, ZHOU Huan^*

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The work aims to optimize the design of medical equipment ecosystem interfaces and enhance the experience of users such as sampling personnel, laboratory physicians, and non-medical administrative staff by establishing a scientific and rational evaluation system, thereby providing scientific strategies for the interface design of medical equipment ecosystems. Through questionnaires, field research, expert interviews, and literature reviews, the requirements for the medical equipment ecosystem interface were gathered, and an evaluation indicator system was constructed accordingly. Considering that the evaluation of these interfaces relied heavily on experts' subjective perceptions, with differences in experts' judgment potentially compromising the scientific validity and reliability of the results, a comprehensive weighting approach combing the Combination Ordered Weighted Averaging (C-OWA) operator with the entropy method was employed to assign weights to the indicators, thereby reducing subjective bias. Finally, the PROMETHEE Ⅱ method was applied to evaluate multiple design schemes comprehensively, ensuring both the overall comprehensiveness of the evaluation and the rationality of the decision-making process, ultimately selecting the optimal scheme. Based on the data from the decision-making process, design strategies applicable to the medical equipment ecosystem interface were proposed. Through the combination of models and data, the comprehensive weights of various design indicators were obtained. The weights were ranked in the order of auxiliary graphics, cognitive load, equipment collaboration, etc. The application of PROMETHEE Ⅱ further clarified the relative strengths and weaknesses of the various design schemes, providing an intuitive reference for interface design decisions. Overall, this evaluation model can provide a reliable assessment basis for medical equipment interface design. The design strategies proposed in conjunction with the data process can effectively enhance the user experience and system operation efficiency of the medical equipment ecosystem interface.

Key words

Interface design / comprehensive weighting / PROMETHEE II / medical equipment / human-computer interaction / design evaluation

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

TIAN Fei, HAO Jiahui, JI Hairu, ZHOU Huan. Evaluation of Medical Equipment Ecosystem Interfaces Based on a Comprehensive Weighting-PROMETHEE Ⅱ Model[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2026, 47(6): 87-101 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.06.009

References

[1] 健康中国行动推进委员会.健康中国行动(2019—2030年)[EB/OL].(2019-07-15)[2024-09-22]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm.
Healthy China Action Promotion Committee. Healthy China Action (2019-2030)[EB/OL]. (2019-07-15)[2024-09-22]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm.
[2] 宋修山, 王毅, 于新海, 等. 从医疗器械的工业设计谈医疗器械创新[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2017, 23(21):30-31.
SONG X S, WANG Y, YU X H, et al.Industry Discussion on the Innovation of Medical Instruments from the Industrial Design of Medical Devices[J]. China Medical Device Information, 2017, 23(21):30-31.
[3] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 医疗器械质量管理体系用于法规的要求:GB/T 42061—2022[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2022:44.
State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Medical Devices—Quality Management Systems—Requirements for Regulatory Purposes:GB/T 42061—2022[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 出版年:出版页码.
[4] 石镇山, 杜孟新, 孙振, 等. 我国医疗装备创新发展回顾和展望[J]. 中国医学装备, 2024, 21(10):167-170.
SHI Z S, DU M X, SUN Z, et al.Review and Prospect of Innovative Development of Medical Equipment in China[J]. China Medical Equipment, 2024, 21(10):167-170.
[5] 袁莉, 杨随先, 韩志甲. 基于全生命周期设计思想的工业设计方法[J]. 包装工程, 2005, 26(3):184-186.
YUAN L, YANG S X, HAN Z J.Industrial Design Method Based on LCD Thought[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2005, 26(3):184-186.
[6] 周强, 王琴, 叶乃芳, 等. “医产教研融合”在检验诊断学研究生培养模式的探究[J]. 生物学杂志, 2024, 41(6):111-115.
ZHOU Q, WANG Q, YE N F, et al.Exploration Ofintegration of Medicine Industry Education and Research in the Training Model of Masters Student in Laboratory Medicine[J]. Journal of Biology, 2024, 41(6):111-115.
[7] 杨洁, 郭霁莹. “十四五”医疗装备产业发展规划亮相[N]. 中国证券报, 2021-12-29(A05).
YANG J, GUO J Y. The Development Plan for the Medical Equipment Industry During the 14th Five-Year Plan Period Has Been Unveiled[N]. China Securities Journal, 2021-12-29(A05).
[8] 张宇鸣, 程云章, 田瑞雪, 等. 全链服务助力医疗装备企业创新发展[J]. 张江科技评论, 2024(2):28-31.
ZHANG Y M, CHENG Y Z, TIAN R X, et al.Full Chain Service Helps Medical Equipment Enterprises to Innovate and Develop[J]. Zhangjiang Technology Review, 2024(2):28-31.
[9] 国家市场监督管理总局.医疗器械分类规则[EB/OL]. (2015-06-03)[2023-04-01].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2015/content_2961719.htm.
State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration Rules for the Classification of Medical Devices[EB/OL]. (2015-06-03)[2023-04-01]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2015/content_2961719.htm.
[10] VICENTE K J.Ecological Interface Design:Progress and Challenges[J]. Human Factors, 2002, 44(1):62-78.
[11] VICENTE K J, RASMUSSEN J.Ecological Interface Design:Theoretical Foundations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1992, 22(4):589-606.
[12] RASMUSSEN J, VICENTE K J.Coping with Human Errors through System Design:Implications for Ecological Interface Design[J]. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1989, 31(5):517-534.
[13] CEIPEK R, HAUTZ J, PETRUZZELLI A M, et al.A Motivation and Ability Perspective on Engagement in Emerging Digital Technologies:The Case of Internet of Things Solutions[J]. Long Range Planning, 2021, 54(5):101991.
[14] 张亚鹤, 赵开军, 陈烈胜. 用户体验视角下的合租房共享冰箱设计研究[J]. 机械设计, 2024, 41(S1):228-234.
ZHANG Y H, ZHAO K J, CHEN L S.Research on the Design of Shared Refrigerators in Shared Houses from the Perspective of User Experience[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2024, 41(S1):228-234.
[15] MORADI M, DELAVAR M R, MOSHIRI B.A GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Using Quantifier-Guided OWA Operator:A Case Study of Tehran, Iran[J]. Annals of GIS, 2015, 21(3):209-222.
[16] 曹辉, 魏来, 臧大伟. 基于Vague集犹豫量化的机舱团队协作式评估方法[J]. 中国航海, 2024, 47(1):52-61.
CAO H, WEI L, ZANG D W.A Cooperative Evaluation Method of Marine Engine Room Team Based on Vague Set Hesitation Quantification[J]. Navigation of China, 2024, 47(1):52-61.
[17] 张洪杰, 余恺瑞, 魏甜甜, 等. 基于C-OWA和云模型的高校化工实验室安全韧性评价[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2024, 43(3):253-259.
ZHANG H J, YU K R, WEI T T, et al.Resilience Evaluation of University Chemical Laboratories Safety Based on C-OWA and Cloud Model[J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2024, 43(3):253-259.
[18] 邹志红, 孙靖南, 任广平. 模糊评价因子的熵权法赋权及其在水质评价中的应用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2005, 25(4):552-556.
ZOU Z H, SUN J N, REN G P.Study and Application on the Entropy Method for Determination of Weight of Evaluating Indicators in Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation for Water Quality Assessment[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2005, 25(4):552-556.
[19] 王建波, 秦娜, 黄文静, 等. 基于主成分分析-物元可拓的地铁盾构施工风险评价[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2021, 65(12):102-109.
WANG J B, QIN N, HUANG W J, et al.Evaluation of Metro Shield Construction Risk Based on Principal Component Analysis-Matter-Element Extension Method[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2021, 65(12):102-109.
[20] BRANS J P, VINCKE P.Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method:(the PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making)[J]. Management Science, 1985, 31(6):647-656.
[21] 刘晓蕾, 李安婕. 基于AHP-PROMETHEE Ⅱ法的鸟粪石磷回收污泥预处理方案决策[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(8):3725-3730.
LIU X L, LI A J.Decision-Making Analysis of Excess Sludge Pretreatment for Struvite Recovery Based on AHP-PROMETHEE Ⅱ Method[J]. Environmental Science, 2020, 41(8):3725-3730.
[22] 耿秀丽, 周青超. 基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEEⅡ的多准则决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6):124-129.
GENG X L, ZHOU Q C.Multi Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Probabilistic Language BWM and PROMETHEE Ⅱ[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(6):124-129.
[23] 徐泽水, 罗书琴, 廖虎昌. 概率语言PROMETHEE方法及其在医疗服务中的应用[J]. 系统工程学报, 2019, 34(6):760-769.
XU Z S, LUO S Q, LIAO H C.Probabilistic Linguistic PROMETHEE Method and Its Application in Medical Service[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2019, 34(6):760-769.
[24] 廖虎昌, 杨竹, 徐泽水, 等. 犹豫模糊语言PROMETHEE方法在川酒品牌评价中的应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 34(12):2727-2736.
LIAO H C, YANG Z, XU Z S, et al.A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic PROMETHEE Method and Its Application in Sichuan Liquor Brand Evaluation[J]. Control and Decision, 2019, 34(12):2727-2736.
[25] 郭小宏, 杨加琪, 李琦. 基于综合赋权-TOPSIS模型的RAP再生工厂方案评价[J]. 工程管理学报, 2021, 35(6):37-42.
GUO X H, YANG J Q, LI Q.Research on Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Material Recycling Plant Scheme Based on Comprehensive Weighting-TOPSIS Model[J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2021, 35(6):37-42.
[26] 张娜, 马永超. KANO-FBS模型下的煤矿用自救器用户需求研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2024, 44(5):1008-1018.
ZHANG N, MA Y C.Research on the User Requirements of Self-Rescuers for Coal Mines under the KANO-FBS Model[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2024, 44(5):1008-1018.
[27] 于泽源, 赵武, 张凯, 等. 支持产品迭代设计的知识推送方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(18):292-302.
YU Z Y, ZHAO W, ZHANG K, et al.Knowledge Push Method to Support Iterative Product Design[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58(18):292-302.