The work aims to analyze the inherent mechanism of mutual construction and symbiosis between existing excellent home cases' activating objects and spaces from the perspective of "object-context mutual construction" and explore innovative paths and an objective evaluation system for contemporary new Chinese-style home scenarios, so as to address the issues of cultural semantic loss and symbolization in modern homogenous spaces within the context of new Chinese-style home design. By introducing the sociological cultural scene theory, a two-dimensional model of "object-context mutual construction" was constructed, with physical intervention (form, structure, material) as the x-axis and perceptual response (physics, behavior, emotion) as the y-axis. Thirty typical samples were selected for quantitative scoring and scatterplot clustering to summarize their distribution characteristics, and then five design triggering paths were deduced from simple to complex. Combining expert group decision-making and Kendall consistency testing, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to establish a 3×3 quantitative evaluation matrix with weights for nine basic indicators. Finally, the calculation with the U+ Miaojing tea living space as an empirical object indicated that the design exhibited high coupling across multiple paths, diagnosing its effectiveness in constructing a context that effectively disciplines the bodily behavior through meso-structural construction. The contemporary innovation of new Chinese-style home design is essentially the reproduction of cultural scenes in a systematic way, undergoing a paradigm shift from "individual creation" to "systematic context construction". The five mutual construction paths deduced in this study reveal the generation logic of excellent new Chinese-style home scenarios, and the evaluation matrix constructed provides a quantitative calibration tool for design practice, from implicit charm to explicit effectiveness evaluation.
Key words
new Chinese-style home scenario /
object-context mutual construction /
cultural scene /
innovation path /
evaluation matrix
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 胡俊红, 李炳蔚. 论中国传统家具造物设计的生态观[J]. 包装工程, 2024, 45(24): 204-213.
HU J H, LI B W.Ecological View of Thing-Making Design in Traditional Chinese Furniture[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2024, 45(24): 204-213.
[2] 董豫赣. 游观:中国传统园林的空间叙事与身体经验[J]. 时代建筑, 2009(3): 22-27.
DONG Y G.Touring: Spatial Narration and Physical Experience in Traditional Chinese Gardens[J]. Time + Architecture,2009(3): 22-27.
[3] 王家浩. 从教学理念到新建筑的理念环——格罗皮乌斯的历史化底图[J]. 建筑学报, 2019(12): 79-88.
WANG J H.From the Teaching Idea to the Ideal Ring for New Architecture a Historicized Map of Walter Gropius[J]. Architectural Journal, 2019(12): 79-88.
[4] 许凯明. 《空间的语言》——设计学科的环境心理学视角[J]. 装饰, 2013(9): 68-69.
XU K M.The Language of Space: Design Disciplines of Environmental Psychology Perspective[J]. ZHUANGSHI, 2013(9): 68-69.
[5] KRIPPENDORFF K.The Semantic Turn[M]. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis, 2006: 28-41.
[6] PALLASMAA J.The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses[M]. 2005: 65-79.
[7] HALL E T.The Hidden Dimension[M]. 1966: 53-89.
[8] 诺伯格·舒尔茨. 场所精神: 迈向建筑现象学[M]. 施植明, 译. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社,2010:10-18.
Norberg-Schulz.The Spirit of Place: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture [M]. SHI Z M, Translated. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press,2010: 10-18.
[9] LATOUR B.Reassembling the Social[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005: 63-75.
[10] 胡一伟. 传播符号学视角下的“场域”理论[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 48(6): 97-103. DOI: 10.13764/j.cnki.ncds.2017.06.014.
HU Y W."Field" Theory from the Perspective of Communication Semiotics[J]. Journal of Nanchang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2017, 48(6): 97-103. DOI: 10.13764/j.cnki.ncds.2017.06.014.
[11] 李姝慧. 青年城市漫游的流动空间生产与数字地方感建构[J].青年探索, 2026, (3): 39-50. DOI: 10.13583/j.cnki.issn1004-3780.2026.03.004.
LI S H.Production of Mobile Space and Construction of Digital Sense of Place in Youth City Roaming[J]. Youth Exploration, 2026, (3): 39-50. DOI: 10.13583/j.cnki.issn1004-3780.2026.03.004.
[12] 丁社教, 霍雨薇. 体用不二:中国自主知识体系的文明生成逻辑[J]. 学术探索, 2026, (7): 112-119.
DING S J, HUO Y W."Unity of Essence and Function: The Logic of Civilization Formation in China's Independent Knowledge System"[J]. Academic Exploration, 2026, (7): 112-119
[13] 林崇华, 郝志敏. 古韵今风, 素而不简——《长物志》中古典家具与陈设艺术浅析[J]. 美术大观, 2017(9): 130-131.
LIN C H, HAO Z M.Ancient Rhyme and Current Style, Simple but Not Simple—Analysis of Classical Furniture and Furnishing Art in Chronicles of Long Stories[J]. Art Panorama, 2017(9): 130-131.
[14] 丹尼尔·亚伦·西尔, 特里·尼科尔斯·克拉克. 场景空间品质如何塑造社会生活[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019.
SILVER D A, CLARK T N.Scenario: How Spatial Quality Shapes Social Life[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2019.
[15] 张明, 张页, 贾路思. 传统家具当代化的升维创新——以U+家具为例[J]. 装饰, 2022(9): 58-63.
ZHANG M, ZHANG Y, JIA L S.Modern Upgrading and Innovation of Traditional Furniture: Taking U+Furniture as an Example[J]. ZHUANGSHI, 2022(9): 58-63.
[16] 勒内·笛卡尔, 丁虹惠. 谈谈方法[M]. 万卷出版有限责任公司; 北方联合出版传媒(集团)股份有限公司, 2024.01.
René Descartes, DING H H.Talking about Methods [M]. Wanjuan Publishing House; Northern United Publishing Media (Group) Co., Ltd., 2024.01.
[17] CLARKE P W, HARVEY D.The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change[J]. Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), 1991, 44(3): 182.
[18] 李云, 赵雨薇. 从维也纳到法兰克福: 玛格丽特·利霍茨基与装配化厨房的诞生[J]. 装饰, 2024(11): 19-26.
LI Y, ZHAO Y W.From Vienna to Frankfurt: Margarete Lihotzky and the Birth of Prefabricated Kitchen[J]. ZHUANGSHI. 2024(11): 19-26.
[19] 王洪亮. 构建非遗全媒体传播的结构、方法、路径与创新思维[J]. 中国新闻传播研究, 2023(2): 31-44.
WANG H L.Constructing the Structure, Method, Path and Innovative Thinking of Intangible Cultural Heritage Omniedia Communication[J]. China Journalism and Communication Journal, 2023(2): 31-44.
[20] 范玉刚, 许诗怡. 文化记忆的展演与重构——以故宫为个案的文化学视角考察[J]. 南京社会科学, 2024(11): 123-131.
FAN Y G, XU S Y.The Exhibition and Reconstruction of Cultural Memory: A Cultural Studies Perspective on the Forbidden City[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2024(11): 123-131.
[21] 张祎, 于东玖, 郑睿. 传统造物思想在家具产品中的价值重构与设计转化[J]. 包装工程, 2025, 46(24): 171-182.
ZHANG Y, YU D J, ZHENG R.Value Reconstruction and Design Transformation of Traditional Creation Ideas in Home Products[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2025, 46(24): 171-182.
[22] 鲁道夫·阿恩海姆. 艺术与视知觉[M]. 滕守尧, 朱疆源, 译. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 1998: 20-25.
Rudolf Arnheim.Art and Visual Perception[M]. TENG S Y, ZHU J Y, Translated. Chengdu: Sichuan People's Publishing House, 1998: 20-25.
[23] 唐纳德·A·诺曼. 设计心理学1: 日常的设计[M]. 小米, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2015.
Donald A.Norman. The Design of Everyday Things [M]. Translated by Xiaomi. Beijing: CITIC Press, 2015.
[24] U+家具. U+在闽12年|全新福建客厅启幕. [EB/OL]. (2024-11-04)[2026-01-20].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/uZEere3BusUgSWWP8AMPqQ.
U+ Furniture. U+ in Fujian for 12 Years | The New Fujian Living Room Opens. [EB/OL]. (2024-11-4)[2026-07-20]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/uZEere3BusUgSWWP8AMPqQ.
[25] 唐璞妮. 批判与建构: 空间生产理论下的新型公共阅读空间生产研究[J]. 图书馆, 2026(4): 130-136.
TANG P N.Critique and Construction: Study on the Production of New Public Reading Spaces from the Perspective of Spatial Production Theory[J]. Library, 2026(4): 130-136.
[26] 张希文. 具身感知与景观意象: 段义孚“恋地情结”的地理美学[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 58(4): 120-127.
ZHANG X W.Embodied Perception and Landscape Imagery: The Geographic Aesthetics Based on Yi-Fu Tuan's "Topophilia"[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 58(4): 120-127.
PDF(4472 KB)
渝公网安备 50010702501717号