引用本文:滕兆烜,甄永亮,金颂文.反设计辨析[J].包装工程,2017,38(6):134-137.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2747次   下载 2130 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
反设计辨析
滕兆烜, 甄永亮, 金颂文
河北民族师范学院,承德 067000
摘要:
目的 辨析“反设计”这一设计学术语被滥用的种种情形,强调其正确的意义。方法 通过分析历史上的反设计运动、反设计意识,以及这一术语被不恰当使用的种种情形,对“反设计”的意义进行对比和辩证地研究。结论 反设计是20世纪六七十年代意大利的激进设计运动,以及由此衍生开来的与主流权威背道而驰的叛逆性设计意识形态。“反设计”这一术语的使用应遵循单义性原则,设计学理论研究中新概念的构建不应再占用这一术语的表述。
关键词:  反设计  叛逆性设计  返设计  单义性原则
DOI:
分类号:TB472
基金项目:
Discrimination of Anti-Design
TENG Zhao-xuan, ZHEN Yong-liang, JIN Song-wen
Hebei Normal University for Nationalities, Chengde 067000, China
Abstract:
It aims to discriminate of the term "Anti-Design" in the field of design with it's correct meaning. Comparative and dialectical researches on the meaning of "Anti-Design" are performed through the analysis of Anti-Design Movement in history, anti-design ideology and a variety of situations in which the term is used improperly. Anti-Design is a radical design movement in Italy in the 1960s to the 1970s and the resulting treasonous design ideology which is contrary to mainstream and authority. The usage of the term "Anti-Design" must follow the principle of monosemy, and any introduction of new concepts in design theory research should not occupy the representation of the term "Anti-Design".
Key words:  Anti-Design  rebellious design  origin design  principle of monosemy

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护

您是第26147725位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-2

版权所有:《包装工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039 电话:023—68792836传真:023—68792396 Email: designartj@126.com

 

渝公网安备 50010702501717号