| 吕欣,刘玉云.基于AHP-TOPSIS方法的儿童安全座椅设计方案评价研究[J].包装工程,2019,40(14):150-155. |
| 基于AHP-TOPSIS方法的儿童安全座椅设计方案评价研究 |
| Evaluation of Design Alternatives for Child Safety Seat Based on AHP-TOPSIS |
| 投稿时间：2019-02-12 修订日期：2019-07-20 |
| DOI：10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2019.14.025 |
| 中文关键词: 儿童安全座椅 层次分析法 逼近理想解排序法 方案评价 |
| 英文关键词: child safety seat analytic hierarchy process technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution al-ternative evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 解决儿童安全座椅设计方案评价过程中的主观性和片面性等问题，获得科学的设计方案。方法 依据文献研究和用户与专家问卷找出消费者选购产品时考虑的需求点和问题点，初选出儿童安全座椅评价指标；采用合理性测评筛除低效用指标，确定儿童安全座椅评价指标体系的科学构建。提出一种结合层次分析法（AHP）和逼近理想解排序法（TOPSIS）的综合评价方法，对3款儿童安全座椅的设计方案进行综合评价优选，确定第2种设计方案为获得分数最高的优选方案。结论 AHP-TOPSIS模型应用于儿童安全座椅设计方案的优选可以消减决策者对设计方案评价的片面性与主观性，实现相对科学的儿童安全座椅设计方案的评价。该方法在其他产品开发过程中处于设计阶段的方案评价与优选具有一定的通用性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The work aims to solve the subjectivity and one-sidedness in the evaluation process of design alternatives to obtain scientific design alternatives. According to literature research and questionnaires from users and experts, the demand points and problem points that consumers considered when purchasing products were found out, and the evaluation index of child safety seat was initially selected. The rationality evaluation was adopted to screen out the inefficient indicators and to determine the scientific construction of the evaluation index system for child safety seats. A comprehensive evaluation method combining analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was proposed to comprehensively evaluate and optimize the design alternatives of three types of child safety seats, and the second design alternative was determined to be the optimal alternative with the highest score. The optimization of AHP-TOPSIS model applied in design alternatives for child safety seat can reduce the one-sidedness and subjectivity of decision makers in the evaluation of design alternatives and realize relatively scientific evaluation of child safety seat design alternatives. The proposed method has certain versatility in the evaluation and optimization of alternatives at the design stage in the development process of other products. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
