目的 研究开放创新平台的群智设计模式分类，剖析不同群智设计模式的运行特征，既为其他群智创新平台的设计提供指导，也为用户、企业选择合适的平台开展创新活动，为实现知识分享、知识变现等提供参考。方法 对国内典型群智设计平台进行调研，基于现有研究及调研内容，建立群智设计模式分类指标。通过内容分析法从服务性、商业性、社交性、组织性4个维度对研究平台进行全面分析并评估赋值。通过对研究数据进行系统聚类，将研究平台进行分类并分析不同模式平台的运行特征差异。结果 将群智设计平台分为4类模式，即技能型知识变现模式、专业型知识创新模式、项目型知识交易模式、兴趣型知识分享模式。结论 不同模式群智设计平台在设计服务性、商业性、社交性、组织性方面存在差异。技能型知识变现模式通过用户专业技能的商业化转化促进知识交流;专业型知识创新模式则侧重于高质量设计服务的资源整合与合作以推动创新;项目型知识交易模式强调交易驱动和资源的高效配置;兴趣型知识分享模式则着重于用户间的社交互动与知识共创。

The work aims to study the classification of CID models of open innovation platforms and analyze the operation characteristics of different CID models, to guide the design of other crowd intelligence innovation platforms, as well as to provide reference for users and enterprises to choose suitable platforms to carry out innovation activities and realize knowledge sharing and knowledge realization. The typical CID platforms in China were investigated and the classification indexes for CID models were established based on existing studies and research content. The selected platforms were comprehensively analyzed and evaluated by the content analysis method, with values assigned across four dimensions of design serviceability, commercial viability, sociability, and organizational structure. Through hierarchical clustering of the research data, these platforms were classified, allowing for an analysis of the differences in operation characteristics among various model platforms. The CID platforms were classified into four distinct model types:the Skill-based Knowledge Realization Model, the Professional Knowledge Innovation Model, the Project-based Knowledge Transaction Model, and the Interest-based Knowledge Sharing Model. The various models of CID platforms exhibit distinct differences in design serviceability, commercial viability, sociability, and organizational structure. The Skill-based Knowledge Realization Model facilitates knowledge exchange through the commercialization of users' professional skills; the Professional Knowledge Innovation Model emphasizes resource integration and collaboration among high-quality design services to foster innovation; the Project-based Knowledge Transaction Model prioritizes transaction-driven approaches for efficient resource allocation; and the Interest-based Knowledge Sharing Model focuses on social interaction and collaborative knowledge creation among users.