面向乘客信任校准的Robotaxi座舱交互策略及设计实践研究

刘雨佳, 黄心悦, 黄心健, 王晨阳

包装工程(设计栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (16) : 81-91.

PDF(4162 KB)
PDF(4162 KB)
包装工程(设计栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (16) : 81-91. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.16.008
工业设计

面向乘客信任校准的Robotaxi座舱交互策略及设计实践研究

  • 刘雨佳, 黄心悦*, 黄心健, 王晨阳
作者信息 +

Interaction Design Strategies and Design Practice Study for Robotaxi Cabins Oriented Toward Passenger Trust Calibration

  • LIU Yujia, HUANG Xinyue*, HUANG Xinjian, WANG Chenyang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 针对无人驾驶出租车(Robotaxi)公众信任度不足的问题,构建以信任校准为目标的座舱人机界面(Human-Machine Interface,HMI)交互设计策略,为车企提供理论和实践参考,提升乘客信任度与产品市场接受度。方法 基于详尽可能性模型(Elaboration Likelihood Model,ELM),从信息加工的动机与能力两个维度出发,分析乘客在不同驾驶情境下的信息加工路径变化机制,明确外周路径、中心路径及双路径协同模式,提出相应的Robotaxi座舱交互设计策略并进行HMI设计实践。结果 提出了一套适应动态情境的Robotaxi座舱交互设计框架及其具体设计策略。该框架在低认知负荷情境下通过行为状态层支持乘客对系统运行安全性的快速感知,在需要深度理解的情境中通过决策意图层与行为原因层促进中心路径的信息加工,并在高风险或异常情境下通过双路径协同机制实现信任修复,从而实现信息呈现方式与乘客认知状态的有效匹配。结论 基于ELM的座舱交互设计策略有望系统性地回应Robotaxi 乘客在动态行驶情境中的差异化认知需求,在理论层面有助于引导乘客形成与系统实际能力相匹配的校准信任,为无人驾驶出租车的人机交互设计提供了可参考的理论依据与设计实践。

Abstract

The work aims to address insufficient public trust in robotaxi, and propose an in-cabin human-machine interface (HMI) design strategy for trust calibration, so as to provide theoretical and practical references for automakers and enhance passenger trust and market acceptance of products. Based on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM), it examined how passengers' information-processing routes varied across driving scenarios in terms of motivation and ability. By integrating the peripheral route, central route, and a dual-path collaboration mode, corresponding interaction design strategies for robotaxi cabins were proposed and HMI design practices were conducted. The study developed an interaction design framework and its specific design strategies. The framework used a behavior status layer to support rapid safety perception under low cognitive load, decision intent and behavior reason layers to support deeper understanding when needed, and a dual-path collaboration mode to repair trust in high-risk or abnormal situations, so as to achieve an effective match between the information presentation method and the cognitive state of passengers. The ELM-based cabin interaction design strategy is expected to systematically address the differentiated cognitive needs of robotaxi passengers in dynamic driving scenarios. At the theoretical level, it helps guide passengers to develop calibrated trust that matches the actual capabilities of the system, and provides a referable theoretical basis and design practice for the human-machine interaction design of robotaxis.

关键词

无人驾驶出租车 / 详尽可能性模型 / 信任校准 / 人机界面 / 交互设计策略

Key words

robotaxi / elaboration likelihood model (ELM) / trust calibration / human-machine interface (HMI) / interaction design strategy

引用本文

导出引用1
刘雨佳, 黄心悦, 黄心健, 王晨阳. 面向乘客信任校准的Robotaxi座舱交互策略及设计实践研究[J]. 包装工程. 2026, 47(16): 81-91 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.16.008
LIU Yujia, HUANG Xinyue, HUANG Xinjian, WANG Chenyang. Interaction Design Strategies and Design Practice Study for Robotaxi Cabins Oriented Toward Passenger Trust Calibration[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2026, 47(16): 81-91 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.16.008
中图分类号: TB472   

参考文献

[1] KAPLAN L, NURULLAEVA L, HELVESTON J P.Modeling the Operational and Labor Costs of Autonomous Robotaxi Services[J]. Transport Policy, 2024, 159: 108-119.
[2] LIN B Y, FAN Y F, YANG R.The Future of Urban Travel and Tourism: A Text Mining Analysis of Robotaxi Sentiment and Adoption[J]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2025, 42(4): 479-494.
[3] 蔡萌亚, 王文丽. 汽车智能座舱交互设计研究综述[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(6): 430-440.
CAI M Y, WANG W L.Review of Interaction Design in Automotive Intelligent Cockpit[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(6): 193-196.
[4] VOSOOGHI R, KAMEL J, PUCHINGER J, et al.Robo-Taxi Service Fleet Sizing: Assessing the Impact of User Trust and Willingness-to-Use[J]. Transportation, 2019, 46(6): 1997-2015.
[5] WEI W, SUN J, MIAO W, et al.Using the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to Explore how to Increase Users’ Intention to Take a Robotaxi[J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2024, 11: 746.
[6] PETTY R E, CACIOPPO J T.The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion[M]//BERKOWITZ L. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: Vol. 19. New York: Academic Press, 1986: 123-205.
[7] MAYER R C, DAVIS J H, SCHOORMAN F D.An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 709-734.
[8] LEE J D, SEE K A.Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance[J]. Human Factors, 2004, 46(1): 50-80.
[9] LIU Y X, LI H X, PAN Y.Understanding Perceived Ride Safety and Trust Formation in Robotaxi Services under Day and Night Conditions[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 41798.
[10] 彭亚男. 基于自动化信任理论的无人驾驶出租车系统交互设计研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2025.
PENG Y N.Research on Interaction Design of Robotaxi System Based on Automated Trust Theory[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2025.
[11] HOFF K A, BASHIR M.Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors that Influence Trust[J]. Human Factors, 2015, 57(3): 407-434.
[12] SAUER V, MERTENS A, REICHE M, et al.Perception and Processing in Automated Driving-a Dual Process Application[C]//HCI International 2020-Late Breaking Papers: Digital Human Modeling and Ergonomics, Mobility and Intelligent Environments. Cham: Springer, 2020: 193-206.
[13] 刘雨佳,邓惠君,张超,等.基于用户接受度的智能车载虚拟机器人交互设计及教学应用[J].实验技术与管理, 2025, 42(2): 197-205.
LIU Y J, DENG H J, ZHANG C, et al.User Acceptance-Based Interaction Design and Teaching Application of Intelligent In-Vehicle Virtual Robots[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2025, 42(2): 197-205.
[14] COLLEY M, SPEIDEL O, STROHBECK J, et al.Effects of Uncertain Trajectory Prediction Visualization in Highly Automated Vehicles on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2023, 7(4): 1-23.
[15] 吴超凡. 基于情境感知的无人驾驶出租车情感化设计研究[D]. 杭州: 杭州电子科技大学, 2024.
WU C F.Research on Emotional Design of Robotaxi Based on Context Awareness[D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2024.
[16] 王铁旦, 胡艺朋, 彭定洪. 用户感性偏好导向的智能语音交互设计评价方法[J]. 工业工程, 2024, 27(2): 57-66.
WANG T D, HU Y P, PENG D H.An Evaluation Method for Intelligent Voice Interaction Design Based on User Perceptual Preference[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2024, 27(2): 57-66.
[17] 李勇, 郝瑞敏, 林晓鹏. 用户体验视角下的人车交互设计研究[J]. 美术学报, 2022(6): 132-138.
LI Y, HAO R M, LIN X P.Research on Human-Vehicle Interaction Design from the Perspective of User Experience[J]. Art Journal, 2022(6): 132-138.
[18] BRANDT T, WILBRINK M, OEHL M.Transparent Internal Human-Machine Interfaces in Highly Automated Shuttles to Support the Communication of Minimal Risk Maneuvers to the Passengers[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2024, 107: 275-287.
[19] 李奕洁, 张玲, 黄琪璋, 等. 系统透明度信息对人机信任和协同决策的影响[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(20): 25-33.
LI Y J, ZHANG L, HUANG Q Z, et al.Impact of System Transparency Information on Human-Machine Trust and Collaborative Decision Making[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(20): 25-33.
[20] 刘雨佳,张超.智能车载机器人交互场景的模型构建与设计研究[J].工业工程设计,2026,8(2):83-93.
LIU Y J, ZHANG C.Model Construction and Design Research of Interaction Scenarios for Intelligent In-vehicle Robots[J]. Industrial & Engineering Design, 2026, 8(2): 83-93.

基金

广东省高等教育学会“十五五”规划2026年度高等教育研究课题(GJXH26589); 广东工业大学校级大学生创新训练计划项目(xj2026118450690); 广东工业大学研究生教育建设及改革创新项目(2024yjg007); 广东工业大学校级本科教学工程教育教学改革项目(广工大教字[2025]139号); 广州市科技计划基础与应用基础研究项目(2025A04J3371); 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD25YYS43)

PDF(4162 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/