| 丁俊,丁诗瑶.黔东南传统工艺现代转化的协同设计研究[J].包装工程,2020,40(24):286-293. |
| 黔东南传统工艺现代转化的协同设计研究 |
| Co-design of Modern Transformation of Southeast Guizhou’s Traditional Craft |
| 投稿时间：2020-06-12 |
| DOI：10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.24.043 |
| 中文关键词: 传统工艺 黔东南 协同设计 设计实践 |
| 英文关键词: traditional craft southeast Guizhou collaborative design design practice |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金艺术学项目“场域、技艺及视觉:蒙古族饮食器具造物语境研究”(16CG169);江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助项目(苏教师〔2018〕12号)阶段性成果;广东省社会科学研究基地“设计科学与艺术研究中心”资助课题 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 以协同设计的方式调动利益相关者的积极性，有利于黔东南传统工艺的可持续发展。方法 通过参与式观察法梳理黔东南传统工艺现代转化的既有路径，结合当前设计发展趋势和当地传统工艺的生存现状提出协同设计的思路。通过研究性访谈、设计实践的方式，反思协同设计介入当地传统工艺现代转化的路径与方法。结论 在既有设计路径下，当地传统工艺的现代转化以商业价值为核心诉求;而协同设计重视利益相关者的意见，改变了传统设计以用户为中心的方式，实现了从产品驱动向问题驱动的转型，并最终实现了多重价值。对于黔东南传统工艺的现代转化而言，实现协同设计的关键在于实施基础与实施方式两方面。前者包括以共享知识资源库为核心的工作平台和以社会创新矩阵为核心的工具包;后者包括以当地手艺人、潜在用户、设计师为核心的参与人群，以设计院校、当地文化机构和传统工艺工作站为核心的实施主体和以设计思维为核心的实施手段。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| It is beneficial to the sustainable development of traditional craft in southeast Guizhou, as it engages stakeholders by collaborative design. Through literature analysis and case study, the article analyzed the existing path of engaging traditional craft into the modern design process. Based on the design trend and the existing situation of local craft development, the article proposed collaborative design. Through research interviews and design practice, it summerized the path and method of collaborative design intervening in the modern transformation of local traditional crafts. Under the existing design path, the modern transformation of local traditional crafts takes commercial value as the core appeal; however, collaborative design pays attention to the opinions of stakeholders, changes the user-centered way of traditional design, realizes the transformation from product-driven to problem-driven, and finally realizes the realization of multiple values For the modern transformation of traditional crafts in southeast Guizhou, the key to realize collaborative design lies in the implementation basis and implementation mode. The former one includes platform which centers on shared craft knowledge database and toolkit which includes social innovation matrix as a new path; while the later one includes the participants consisting of local craftsmen, potential users and designers, implementer consisting of design schools, local cultural institutes, and traditional craft workshop, and application method using design thinking as an effective approach. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
